tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-74319110932089882222012-02-16T15:42:17.551-08:00Federalists and Anti-Federalists ArgumentsMrs. Abrahamnoreply@blogger.comBlogger21100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7431911093208988222.post-55630150100421934622010-02-22T07:18:00.001-08:002010-02-22T09:00:51.971-08:00Friends of the Constitution, who rallied suport for ramification argued that a bill of rights was not necessary because the Constitution effectively protected the rights of the People<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7431911093208988222-5563015010042193462?l=argumentandrebuttal.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>Mrs. Abrahamnoreply@blogger.com87tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7431911093208988222.post-22690115748287542932010-02-17T15:33:00.000-08:002010-02-22T09:02:56.706-08:00Powerful organized opposition to the Constitution had developed and these men spoke out against ratification, objected that a bill of rights had not been included, that the President had too much independence, and the Senate was too aristocratic.&nbsp; They also thought Congress had too many powers and the national government had too much authority<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7431911093208988222-2269011574828754293?l=argumentandrebuttal.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>Mrs. Abrahamnoreply@blogger.com32